More Great Job Numbers?

6 min read

In this newsletter series, we have admonished our readers to dig deeper and analyze the numbers that are presented to us in the mainstream. In many instances, the numbers presented can be looked at in many ways. Such is the case with any statistical data, the data can be presented in various ways to fit the varying narratives. However, what truly matters is what the numbers present in their raw form. In our article ‘Don’t Be Fooled By The Numbers!’ we advised our readers not to take the numbers at face value or in the manner that they are presented, but to dive deeper into the numbers to see the true nature of what they represent.

For months we have been told that the job market is booming. On the face of it, it looks like this is the truth. There are plenty of jobs out there and the unemployment rate is low. However, when you dig into the numbers you realize that the labor force participation rate is relatively low and that the jobs that have been created are low-income and part-time jobs as opposed to the ones that are being destroyed which are high-income full-time jobs. The other thing we need to take into account is that the number of employees that we are seeing is a simple fact that people are taking on multiple jobs. So in essence we are double-counting and triple-counting individuals at work. Still, yet another thing to think about, is the fact that there are a lot of retirees that are coming out of retirement to go get jobs to compensate for the reduction in the purchasing power of their fixed income payments. We are sure our readers do not think this is a good thing.

In this week’s full article, we share some details about what’s going on with this so-called strong job market and a strong economy. Giving our reader some insights into what’s going on beneath the surface level of the numbers.

For related readings, please see also: ‘Aviation: Jobs Jobs Jobs!’, ‘Aviation: Making Ends Meet’, ‘Why is it More Expensive to Give Thanks?’, ‘Lowering Real Wages | Increasing Debt’, ‘Labor: Should I Participate?’, ‘Jobs “Boom” : Is it really?’, ‘Aviation: Can We Be Frank About The Jobs Market?’, ‘Aviation: Are Our Retirements At Risk?’, ‘2023: The Year of Job Losses?’, ‘Inflation Slows, Great News for Income Earners? Well…’, ‘Massive Increase In The Cost of Living!’, and ‘Don’t Be Fooled By The Numbers!

The Bureau of Labor Statistic (BLS) released new jobs data on Friday. According to the report, seasonally adjusted total nonfarm jobs rose 339,000 jobs in May, well above forecasts. The unemployment rate rose slightly from 3.4 percent to 3.7 percent (month over month).

Headlines in the mainstream media declared the headline employment data to be evidence of very strong job growth and economic success. According to Politico, the latest jobs numbers are evidence of a “remarkable resilience of President Joe Biden’s economy” and NPR declared the job market to be “sizzling hot.”

Yet, May appears to be yet another month in which it seems nearly every economic indicator except the payroll jobs data points to an economic slowdown. The Philadelphia Fed’s manufacturing index is in recession territory. The Empire State Manufacturing Survey is, too. The Leading Indicators index keeps looking worse. The yield curve points to recession. Even Federal Reserve staffers, who generally take an implausibly rosy view of the economy, predict recession in 2023. Individual bankruptcy filings were up 23 percent in May. Temp jobs were down, year-over-year, which often indicates approaching recession.

So how do we square all this with yet another jobs report that claims to tell us that the job market is the best it’s been in decades?

Well, a lot of the jobs data isn’t actually very good. The headlines have focused on the so-called Establishment Survey which is a survey of employers and shows only the number of positions, not the number of employed persons. The Household survey, on the other hand, surveys people.

The Household survey over the past two years has not shown nearly as much job growth as the Establishment Survey.

Specifically, we find that since 2022, the Establishment Survey and the Household Survey have ceased to follow a similar trend, with a sizable gap forming between the two surveys. In fact, over the past two years, the two surveys show a gap of 2.2 million:

No alt text provided for this image

Moreover, in May, while the Establishment Survey showed a gain of 339,000 jobs month-over-month, the Household Survey showed a loss of 310,000 employed persons. That’s a gap of more than 600,000. Looking at month-to-month changes, we can also see how the two surveys have diverged since April 2022.

No alt text provided for this image

Part of this growing gap may be due to the fact that the number of responses to the Establishment survey has dropped off in recent years, suggesting that the survey is waning in its reliability as an indicator of the overall economy. The Household Survey, meanwhile, has not seen as large a drop off in responses.

Another factor is the fact that the Establishment Survey does not track self-employed workers, and self-employment has been a significant factor in employment trends over the past three years. Self-employment collapsed in April 2020, but surged by April 2021 to historic highs. It is unknown, of course, how many of these workers were actually replacing lost income from covid-related job losses in this period. By 2023, however, self-employment had collapsed again, and year-over-year self-employment growth dropped by 6.5 percent in May. Excluding the covid lockdown period, that’s the largest year-over-year percentage drop since December 2007, when the Great Recession officially began.

No alt text provided for this image

We might also note that overall, the total number of payroll jobs, as shown in the Establishment Survey, is now up by 3.7 million jobs since the previous peak in March 2020 peak. The Household survey, on the other hand, shows total employed persons up by only 1.9 million persons over the same period. That’s a gap of 1.7 million.

The fact that the two different employment reports tell two different stories has led some economists to wonder about the media’s rosy jobs narrative. As reported by Yahoo Finance last week, economist Ian Shepherdson noted

“This is the strangest employment report for some time… [R]ight now the data suggest that economic growth is stronger than is indicated by most other monthly data. The downward trend in job growth since the summer of 2021 now appears to have flattened-off, though that could change with revisions.”

And economist Paul Ashworth pointed out:

“The bigger-than-expected 339,000 increase in non-farm payroll employment in May will dominate the headlines, but the employment report was not all positive — with a big drop in the household survey measure of employment driving the unemployment rate up to a seven-month high of 3.7% and average weekly hours worked edging down to a three-year low.”

We might also note that the year-over-year gain in average hourly earnings in May (according to the Household Survey) fell to a 25-month low. If the Cleveland Fed’s “Nowcast” is right about inflation for May, then May will have been another month of falling real wages.

Part of the confusion and contradictory date no doubt arises from the fact that “jobs” are not at all homogeneous and employment trends can differ greatly across different industries and regions. This is the natural outcome of fact that monetary inflation is not at all neutral as it enters the economy—as the Austrian School has long pointed out.  The current trend of rapidly decelerating monetary growth will have sizably different effects across the economy. The Establishment Survey is especially inept at capturing these trends in real time.



Ryan McMaken (@ryanmcmaken) is executive editor at the Mises Institute. Send him your article submissions for the Mises Wire and Power and Market, but read article guidelines first. Ryan has a bachelor’s degree in economics and a master’s degree in public policy and international relations from the University of Colorado. He was a housing economist for the State of Colorado. He is the author of Breaking Away: The Case of Secession, Radical Decentralization, and Smaller Polities and Commie Cowboys: The Bourgeoisie and the Nation-State in the Western Genre.


This article was published in the  Mises Wire on June 06, 2023, with the title “Yet Another Month of Questionable Federal Jobs Data as 310,000 Fewer People Report Having Jobs” The views expressed are the author’s, and do not constitute an endorsement by or necessarily represent the views of On Aviation™ or its affiliates.

Thank you for reading this week’s On Aviation™ full article. Are you finding that you know I have to work multiple jobs to make ends meet? Please share your thoughts in the comments below. Remember to check out our On Aviation™ Podcast and continue the conversation on our Twitter and Instagram.

Orlando – On Aviation™

Leave a Reply

Stay up-to-date with aviation developments and tends that matter to you.

Discover On Aviation™

Welcome to On Aviation™ , together we will explore ideas on aviation businesses, training, jobs, certifications, regulations, and more. Check out community articles.

Build great relations

Explore all the content form the On Aviation™  community. Forums, Groups, Members, Posts, Social Wall and many more.

Become a member

Get unlimited access to the best articles on On Aviation™  and support our  lovely authors and content. Sign Up Now For Free